Criticality Analysis
Definition
A structured evaluation to determine the relative importance (criticality) of equipment items based on the consequences of their failure. Criticality analysis considers safety, environmental, production, and cost impacts to classify equipment into criticality categories that drive maintenance strategy, inspection priority, and spare parts stocking decisions.
Context
Criticality analysis is the first step in establishing a risk-based maintenance and inspection program. It determines which equipment deserves the most attention and resources. In Reliatic, criticality classification is a property of assets that influences RBI, FMEA scope, and inspection interval calculations.
Examples
- A criticality analysis classifies a boiler feedwater pump as Criticality A (safety-critical) because its failure could lead to boiler tube overheating and potential rupture.
- Equipment ranked Criticality C (non-critical) is assigned a run-to-failure maintenance strategy because the consequence of failure is limited to minor production inconvenience.
Applicable Standards
- NORSOK Z-008:2017
- IEC 60300-3-11
- API 580
Related Terms
The assignment of a criticality ranking (typically A, B, or C) to each equipment item based on the consequences of its failure across safety, environmental, production, and maintenance cost dimensions. Criticality classification determines the level of engineering attention, inspection rigor, maintenance strategy, and spare parts investment appropriate for each asset.
Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis(FMECA)An extension of FMEA that adds a criticality analysis step to quantify the combined frequency and severity of each failure mode's consequences. FMECA augments FMEA by calculating a criticality number for each failure mode based on the failure effect probability, failure mode ratio, part failure rate, and operating time, enabling a more rigorous mathematical prioritization than RPN alone.
Criticality MatrixA structured evaluation framework used to determine the criticality classification of equipment by scoring its failure consequences across multiple dimensions (typically safety, environment, production, and maintenance cost). The matrix provides a consistent, repeatable methodology for ranking equipment, ensuring that criticality assessments are transparent and defensible.
NORSOK Z-008Risk-Based Maintenance and Consequence Classification standard — establishes a systematic approach to maintenance optimization based on criticality and consequence classification of equipment. It provides a methodology for classifying equipment into maintenance categories and defining maintenance strategies based on the consequence of failure.
Where this appears in Reliatic
This concept is used in the FMEA & Risk module.