Run-to-Failure(RTF)
Definition
A deliberate maintenance strategy where no preventive or predictive maintenance is performed, and the item is allowed to operate until it fails, at which point it is repaired or replaced. RTF is a valid strategy for non-critical items where the consequence of failure is low, the item is not safety-related, redundancy exists, or the failure mode is random (no wear-out pattern). RTF is not the same as neglect — it is a conscious, risk-based decision.
Context
An explicitly chosen strategy in RCM and NORSOK Z-008 analysis for items where the cost of prevention exceeds the cost of failure. RTF is only appropriate when safety and environmental consequences are acceptable. In Reliatic, RTF is a valid PM strategy assignment for assets classified as non-critical.
Examples
- Non-critical utility lighting is assigned a run-to-failure strategy because the consequence of failure is minor (inconvenience only), spares are readily available, and replacement time is 15 minutes.
- A corrosion coupon rack in a non-critical location is run-to-failure because its failure has no safety, environmental, or significant production impact.
Applicable Standards
- SAE JA1011
- NORSOK Z-008:2017
- IEC 60300-3-11
Related Terms
Maintenance performed at predetermined intervals or according to prescribed criteria to reduce the probability of failure or functional degradation. Preventive maintenance includes time-based activities (replacement, overhaul, calibration at fixed intervals), usage-based activities (at fixed operating hours or cycles), and condition-based activities (when monitored parameters indicate intervention is needed). The goal is to prevent failures that would otherwise occur.
Predictive Maintenance(PdM)A maintenance strategy that uses condition monitoring data, analytics, and failure prediction models to determine the optimal timing for maintenance intervention. Predictive maintenance aims to perform maintenance just before failure is expected, maximizing equipment life while minimizing unplanned downtime. It goes beyond condition monitoring by adding prediction — estimating the remaining useful life based on degradation trends.
Criticality ClassificationThe assignment of a criticality ranking (typically A, B, or C) to each equipment item based on the consequences of its failure across safety, environmental, production, and maintenance cost dimensions. Criticality classification determines the level of engineering attention, inspection rigor, maintenance strategy, and spare parts investment appropriate for each asset.
Random FailureA failure that occurs with approximately constant probability per unit time, independent of the item's age or accumulated operating time (Weibull beta approximately 1). Random failures are caused by unpredictable combinations of stress and strength, external events, or operating conditions that cannot be anticipated by age-based inspection or maintenance. They are equally likely to occur at any point during the useful life period.
Where this appears in Reliatic
This concept is used in the Reliability Analytics module.