Failure Mode and Effects Analysis(FMEA)
Definition
A systematic, proactive methodology for evaluating a process, product, or design to identify all possible failure modes, determine their effects on system performance, rank them by risk priority, and recommend actions to reduce or eliminate the highest risks. FMEA examines each component's potential failure modes, their causes, effects at local/system/end levels, current controls, and risk priority numbers.
Context
One of the core modules in Reliatic. The FMEA Workbench provides a full interface for creating, scoring, and managing failure modes associated with assets. FMEA integrates with the RBI module — risk rankings D/E automatically generate failure modes. The methodology follows IEC 60812 with 1-10 scoring scales.
Examples
- An FMEA workshop identifies 45 failure modes for a crude oil distillation column, with 3 scoring above RPN 500 (critical) requiring immediate corrective action.
- A design FMEA on a new compressor installation identifies a single-point failure in the lube oil system that could cause catastrophic bearing damage, leading to a design change adding a redundant oil supply.
Applicable Standards
- IEC 60812:2018
- SAE J1739
- AIAG FMEA Manual
- MIL-STD-1629A
Related Terms
An extension of FMEA that adds a criticality analysis step to quantify the combined frequency and severity of each failure mode's consequences. FMECA augments FMEA by calculating a criticality number for each failure mode based on the failure effect probability, failure mode ratio, part failure rate, and operating time, enabling a more rigorous mathematical prioritization than RPN alone.
Risk Priority Number(RPN)A numerical value that ranks the risk associated with a failure mode by multiplying three independently scored factors: Severity (impact of the failure), Occurrence (likelihood of the failure happening), and Detection (likelihood of detecting the failure before it reaches the end user or causes harm). RPN ranges from 1 to 1,000, where higher values indicate greater risk priority.
SeverityA rating of the worst potential consequence of a failure mode, scored on a scale of 1 (negligible) to 10 (catastrophic/hazardous without warning). Severity considers the impact on safety, environment, operations, and financial loss. Severity ratings should only change if the design or process is fundamentally altered to eliminate or mitigate the failure effect.
OccurrenceA rating of the likelihood that a specific failure mode will occur, scored on a scale of 1 (extremely unlikely) to 10 (almost certain/inevitable). Occurrence is based on historical failure data, engineering judgment, or generic reliability databases. It represents the probability of the failure cause generating the failure mode during the defined assessment period.
DetectionA rating of the ability of current controls to detect the failure mode or its cause before the failure reaches the end user or causes harm, scored on a scale of 1 (almost certain detection) to 10 (no detection capability). Detection evaluates the effectiveness of existing inspection, monitoring, and testing methods. Lower detection scores indicate better detection capability.
Failure ModeThe specific manner in which a component, subsystem, or system fails to perform its intended function or performs it in an unintended way. A failure mode describes the observable manifestation of a failure — what goes wrong — rather than why it goes wrong (failure cause) or what happens as a result (failure effect). Each functional failure may have multiple failure modes.
Criticality AnalysisA structured evaluation to determine the relative importance (criticality) of equipment items based on the consequences of their failure. Criticality analysis considers safety, environmental, production, and cost impacts to classify equipment into criticality categories that drive maintenance strategy, inspection priority, and spare parts stocking decisions.
Where this appears in Reliatic
This concept is used in the FMEA & Risk module.