Generic asset management tools were built for work order tracking, not risk governance. Reliatic was built from scratch for integrity engineers who need quantitative risk analysis, immutable audit trails, and regulatory compliance evidence.
Reliatic was designed around API 580/581, IEC 60812, and NORSOK Z-008 from day one. No bolt-on modules or third-party plugins — the risk calculation engine is native to the platform.
Every risk score, inspection finding, and acceptance decision is cryptographically signed and linked to the approver. Your audit log cannot be edited or deleted — by anyone, including the vendor.
When an auditor asks how you derived the inspection interval on V-2041, the answer is one click. The platform generates compliance exports aligned to the standards your regulator expects.
No six-month implementation project. We configure your asset taxonomy, damage mechanism library, and RPN thresholds during a supported onboarding engagement — most pilots are live within 4–6 weeks.
A direct comparison across the capabilities that matter for regulated asset-intensive industries.
| Capability | Reliatic | Spreadsheets | Generic CMMS | Legacy Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Management | ||||
| API 580/581 quantitative risk assessment | ||||
| PoF × CoF scoring per damage mechanism | ||||
| Risk-driven inspection interval calculation | ||||
| Real-time risk register with status tracking | ||||
| Governance & Compliance | ||||
| Immutable, hash-chained audit log | ||||
| Decision journals with approver trail | ||||
| One-click regulatory compliance export | ||||
| ISO 31000 / NORSOK Z-008 alignment | ||||
| Reliability Engineering | ||||
| Weibull analysis and B-life calculation | ||||
| Monte Carlo availability simulation | ||||
| MTTF / MTBF tracking per asset | ||||
| FMEA with RPN scoring (IEC 60812) | ||||
| Operations | ||||
| Digital inspection workflows | ||||
| Preventive maintenance scheduling | ||||
| Action management and closure tracking | ||||
| Root Cause Analysis (RCA) workflows | ||||
| Integration & Security | ||||
| REST API with tenant-scoped rate limits | ||||
| SSO / SAML enterprise authentication | ||||
| Row-Level Security (database-enforced) | ||||
| Bulk CSV/Excel import with validation | ||||
Comparison reflects general capabilities of the respective tool categories, not any specific vendor product.
Spreadsheets are flexible. That flexibility is the problem. When risk scores live in one file, inspection history in another, and corrosion allowances in a shared drive no one owns, you cannot produce a coherent audit trail when the regulator asks for one.
Reliatic replaces that fragmentation with a single governed system where every data point is timestamped, attributed, and traceable — and where the audit log is physically immutable at the database layer.
Three common paths to Reliatic — each triggered by a specific operational failure.
The team outgrew Excel. They needed version control, audit trails, and multi-user collaboration without merge conflicts or lost formulas. The typical trigger is a failed audit or a near-miss incident where the team could not reconstruct the decision trail fast enough. Once the regulator asks for evidence you cannot produce from a spreadsheet, the conversation shifts from “should we switch” to “how fast can we switch.”
The facility had work order management but no risk-based inspection planning. A CMMS tracks what was done but not whether the right decision was made — it logs the inspection but not the risk assessment that justified the interval. The typical trigger is a regulatory body asking for quantitative risk justification that the CMMS cannot produce. The gap between “we did the work” and “we can prove the work was risk-appropriate” is what drives the switch.
The team had the right idea but the wrong decade. On-premise, single-user, no API, no real-time collaboration. Inspectors in the field cannot access data without VPN, and the software vendor stopped shipping updates two years ago. The typical trigger is an IT modernization mandate or vendor end-of-life announcement. When the tool that runs your integrity program is itself an integrity risk, the decision makes itself.
Switching integrity management tools is daunting because your data represents years of institutional knowledge. Reliatic's migration path is designed to preserve that knowledge completely.
We review your existing data sources (spreadsheets, CMMS exports, legacy database dumps) and map every field to the Reliatic data model. Nothing is discarded without your explicit approval.
During the pilot period, Reliatic runs alongside your existing tools. Your team validates that every asset, every risk score, and every inspection record transferred correctly before you cut over.
Your historical inspection data feeds the reliability engine immediately. Weibull analysis, MTTF calculations, and corrosion rate projections start working from day one because they have your actual operating history, not a blank slate.
Once validation is complete, you decommission the old system. Reliatic becomes your single source of truth with full historical continuity.
We run scoped demos using your asset types and damage mechanisms — not a generic walkthrough. Book a 30-minute discovery call to see how Reliatic compares to your current tooling on the capabilities that matter to your program.